Random musings on random stuff.
And people wonder why I have no desire to visit the US any more : http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/30/police_raids/index.html
Two comments posted decided to say "well, the UK & Europe aren't any better". One just used text, and quite frankly misses the point completely, and seems to think it's OK for the police to crack down on anyone who has a political viewpoint that differs with them. I'm not interested in publishing that comment, so I'm not. The second one decided to hotlink to someone else's website, something I think is pretty dumb, so I'm not publishing that comment either.
Looks like both comments came from the following person:
61.60.58.71.in-addr.arpa name = c-71-58-60-61.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
Doing a traceroute back to them it looks like the person who said that people with opposing views to him/her should be rounded up by the police is based in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, maybe. hsd == huntingdon school district ? (given http://www.huntsd.org/ exists ), and given this end to the traceroute:
1 www.routerlogin.com (192.168.2.1) 1.766 ms 0.62 ms 0.534 msI wonder if that is the case if the people who run (what is presumably a school network) would be happy with the intolerance of other political viewpoints and the advocacy of police action against people for simply having different views - especially given the banner on huntsd.org above. Now I don't know if the above IP is related to that college, but I am half tempted to find out.
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 68.86.89.177 (68.86.89.177) 92.047 ms 90.493 ms 91.595 ms
9 pos-0-2-0-0-crs01.plainfield.nj.panjde.comcast.net (68.85.192.201) 92.38 ms 94.633 ms 92.663 ms
10 be-60-crs01.ivyland.pa.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.208.46) 107.094 ms 94.747 ms 98.27 ms
11 po-90-ar01.lowerpaxton.pa.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.208.45) 102.469 ms 99.21 ms 98.65 ms
12 te-1-1-ur01.newport.pa.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.158.34) 99.302 ms 100.118 ms 99.479 ms
13 te-1-1-ur01.lewistown.pa.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.158.38) 100.049 ms 102.295 ms 100.453 ms
14 te-1-1-ur01.huntingdon.pa.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.158.94) 102.51 ms 101.681 ms 101.135 ms
15 te-1-1-ur01.statecollege.pa.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.158.42) 106.174 ms 105.022 ms 101.726 ms
16 * * *
17 c-71-58-60-61.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (71.58.60.61) 111.543 ms 111.244 ms 111.561 ms
Looks like this tracking back has upset the same kid (convinced it's just some stupid high school kid now) - and again has decided to post some vitriol, which again completely misses the point. Same person doesn't seem to realise that them posting vitriol as a comment on my blog doesn't make me required to republish their words.
So you are going to base your life on incidents that might or might not be representative of reality?
Here's a heuristic to ponder:
(1) if something is interesting enough for the press to report on, that might be because it is very unusual, and thus you shouldn't overemphasize its importance in your understanding of the world.
(2) because the press loves violence of all sorts ("if it bleeds, it leads"), violent events will be reported on far too often.
Add these two together and you'll realize that the press is probably a useless indicator of where and how often violence takes place. A useful corrective would be statistics gathered by someone with no monetary stake in entertaining the masses, but common sense also helps. For those interesting in further reading, I'd recommend Wikipedia's page on the availability heuristic, and a then deeper examination of the delightfully long list of cognitive biases.
You jump to some interesting conclusions that say more about yourself than they say about me.
Quite the cheap shot, that.
You know nothing about me other than the short comment I've left on your site -- admittedly snarky, but at least showing some evidence of thinking about what you've said about yourself.
And you response is only an insulting insinuation?
Perhaps you are writing "random musings on random stuff" only to gather fawning comments and make fun of anything less else?
What a bore.
Again, your comment says more about you, than it does about me.